Crumb-Coated Salmon Recipe
Crumb-Coated Salmon Recipe photo by Taste of Home

Crumb-Coated Salmon Recipe

Read Reviews
4.5 8 7
Publisher Photo
Crumb-Coated Salmon, shared by Kathy Peltier of Kalispell, Montana, is pleasantly seasoned with lemon-pepper and dill. "My husband, who is on a restricted diet, and I both enjoy this quick and flavorful fillet," she writes.
TOTAL TIME: Prep/Total Time: 25 min.
MAKES:4 servings
Quick Test Kitchen Approved
TOTAL TIME: Prep/Total Time: 25 min.
MAKES: 4 servings


  • 2 eggs
  • 1/2 cup milk
  • 1 cup dry bread crumbs
  • 2 teaspoons lemon-pepper seasoning
  • 1/2 teaspoon dill weed
  • 1/4 teaspoon garlic powder
  • 4 salmon fillets (6 ounces each)

Nutritional Facts

1 serving (1 each) equals 967 calories, 53 g fat (11 g saturated fat), 369 mg cholesterol, 769 mg sodium, 22 g carbohydrate, 1 g fiber, 95 g protein.


  1. In a shallow dish, beat eggs and milk. In another shallow dish, combine the bread crumbs, lemon-pepper, dill and garlic powder. Dip salmon in egg mixture, then coat with crumb mixture.
  2. Place on a greased baking sheet. Bake at 350° for 14-18 minutes or until fish flakes easily with a fork. Yield: 4 servings.
Originally published as Crumb-Coated Salmon in Taste of Home December/January 2004, p20

Full-Bodied White Wine

Enjoy this recipe with a full-bodied white wine such as Chardonnay or Viognier.

Reviews for Crumb-Coated Salmon

5 Star
4 Star
3 Star
2 Star
1 Star
Please Log In or Join to add a rating and review.
Click stars to rate
Any changes to your rating or review will appear where you originally posted your review
Loading Image
Sort By :
Reviewed Oct. 2, 2014


Reviewed Nov. 17, 2013

"does one serving really equal more than 900 calories???"

Reviewed Jun. 18, 2013

"Figured using Cooking Spray."

Reviewed Jun. 18, 2013

"I figured the nutrition on SparkPeople and got : 467 cal.; 23.9 g. fat (6.9 Sat Fat, .8 each poly and mono); 138 g. cholesterol; 311 mg. sodium; 21 g. carbs; 1.2 g. fiber, 40.7 g. protein; 3.3 g. sugar for 1-6 oz. fillet"

Reviewed Sep. 22, 2010

"Didn't try due to the nutrition facts which I think are way off."

Loading Image